Thanks for Secrecy World Reviews

Secrecy World I’m feeling especially thankful today. And grateful, very grateful.

On Tuesday my book, Secrecy World, was published. We had a fantastic kickoff event at Barnes & Noble. Thank you to all who turned out.

As all books are, Secrecy World was a true labor of love. And, as with every book, the final product exists because of the support and insight of people other than the author. My list includes everyone from my superhumanly patient, brilliant wife Eve to sharp-eyed Holt editor Paul Golob to crackerjack reporter Ryan Chittum. The book also depended on the work of hundreds of kickass journalists around the world who form the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists. I am so thankful – as we all should be – that they labor on our behalf. Please see the acknowledgements in Secrecy World for a full list of all those who deserve thanks.

Now, the early reviews are beginning to arrive. And I am pleased for those who have read the book and found it meaningful, and even fun.

People like Joe Tauzer, who wrote on GoodReads:

This is book is great especially in the audio version! The reader is the author. This is not a liberal or conservative book, it’s an explanation of how what was learned in the Panama Papers. This book exposes how hiding money to avoid taxes is so universal among the world’s elite. How one companies hack has given the layman a window in to the creative and grotesque of accounting of the worlds rich.
ICIJ is the organization we have to thank for compiling most of the data from the hacks. They have a great website which I recommend you look in to and try your alma mater in the search bar. I found my former college along with many of the colorful characters in this book, in the ranks entities who own offshore accounts.

David, also on GoodReads:

A lot of this very readable book is about the efforts of a large and far-flung team of investigative journalists who, often defying personal egomania, stifling bureaucracy, and the 24-hour-newscycle-driven desire for content now at any cost, worked effectively as a team and published simultaneously across the globe for maximum effect. There are many interesting (in an enraging kind of way) digressions in the story on the path to this end. For example: the 292-foot yacht Donald Trump bought in 1988 (l. 396) had a previous life as a floating brothel for a corrupt arms dealer, and former Vice-president Dick Cheney “was no stranger to offshore companies” (l. 1181), especially during certain Wyoming land deals in the 1990s.

David Wineberg, who wrote on Amazon:

Jake Bernstein has followed the leads backwards and forwards. He fills in the details of who the players are and how they got there. He also takes some minor side trips to corrupt practices like drug dealing, a slave ship, abandoned construction and a fraudulent reinsurer, to show how these players are actively ruining the lives of others with their fake firms. There is even a side trip to the Swiss tax-free art warehouses, where a good hundred billion dollars in precious art is hidden from view and taxation.

The book is structured like a tree. Each of the roots gets an airing, and they all lead up to the visible trunk – Mossack Fonseca, the Panamanian law firm from which all the documents were leaked. The roots consist of Mossfon bureaus around the world, dealing with various corrupt governments, corrupt banks and eager clients. The crown is the billowing scandals the journalists perpetrated, going off in many directions, covering the sky with corruption on a truly global scale.

Eileen Ruth, who wrote on Amazon:

This book reads like a suspense novel. If you want to learn how not to pay your taxes, this is a must read. It seems that the rich from all over the world are doing this. Whether it’s thru shell companies or art work.

Brenda Jubin, who wrote on her blog Reading the Markets, the book was “both riveting and dispiriting”:

Secrecy World is a must-read book for anyone with an interest in, and perhaps a sense of outrage over, how the rich protect their wealth. And, I should note, it’s not just through secret offshore accounts. Delaware and Nevada allow incorporations with virtually no due diligence.

Kirkus, which gave it a starred review:

Mossfon remains a maze worthy of a Cretan palace, but Bernstein does first-rate work in providing a map to a scandal that has yet to unfold completely.

Have a safe and happy Thanksgiving everyone!



The Paradise Papers Hacking and the Consequences of Privacy

Last month, the international law firm Appleby announced it had been the victim of a hacking and that information on its clients was in the hands of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the news gathering organization that broke the story of the Panama Papers in April 2016.

On Sunday, material from that hacking became public. The Paradise Papers exposed the hidden financial dealings of Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, Queen Elizabeth and the athletic apparel company Nike, among many others. As revelations about tax-dodging airplane purchases and secret Russian ownership in tech companies came to light, Appleby declared that it takes its clients’ confidentiality seriously and billed itself as “not the subject of a leak but of a serious criminal act.”

In an age in which personal consumer data is routinely plundered for profit, it’s smart public relations for law firms like Appleby and the tax havens in which their clients hide their assets to present themselves as victims of a global crime epidemic. There is also genuine belief operating here. Jürgen Mossack and Ramón Fonseca, the founders of the law firm whose hacked files formed the heart of the Panama Papers, described their work as safeguarding their clients’ fundamental right to privacy in their financial affairs. Mr. Mossack and Mr. Fonseca insisted that when their customers asked them to set up hundreds of thousands of anonymous companies, trusts and foundations, it too was in the interest of privacy.

However, in the world of offshore finance, privacy long ago became a corrosive secrecy.

Appleby is a major player in a global offshore industry that helps multinational corporations and the mega-wealthy legally move money beyond the reach of the taxman through a network of tax havens and secret financial centers. As a lawyer at Mossack Fonseca candidly wrote in a confidential internal memorandum, “95 percent of our work” is “selling vehicles to avoid paying taxes.”

The amounts involved are staggering. An estimated 8 percent of household financial wealth is held offshore, representing a loss in annual global tax revenue of about $190 billion. But this pales in comparison to the tax avoidance and tax evasion by the large multinational companies that use this system. All told, more than $7.6 trillion may well be hidden in tax havens around the world, according to Gabriel Zucman, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley, who studies the issue.

In Congress, Republicans promote lower tax rates for American corporations even as companies employ the offshore system to pay little tax on billions of dollars in profit. This uncomfortable reality is not the focus of the tax debate in part because firms like Appleby help keep these activities secret. The public is simply unaware.

Meanwhile, there is the torrent of illegal cash that washes through tax havens and secret bank accounts — cash that is often put to illicit use, from bribing public officials to arms trafficking. The research and advocacy organization Global Financial Integrity has estimated that transnational criminal activities account for $1.6 trillion to $2.2 trillion annually. And laundered money represents 2 percent to 5 percent of global G.D.P., according to a recent report by the European Parliament.

The right of privacy keeps this underground river of money secret, but its existence has real-world consequences. Tax avoidance robs governments of funds to pay for education, health care and infrastructure. Prices for homes in New York, Miami, Los Angeles, London and other cities have spiraled beyond the reach of most residents because the global elite, often hiding behind anonymous companies, parks cash in them. And the corruption it enables is a major factor in the persistence of dire poverty in resource-rich regions like Africa.

Last week, the special counsel Robert Mueller indicted Paul Manafort, the former chairman of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, on money laundering charges. The indictment charges that Mr. Manafort used offshore Cypriot companies and overseas bank accounts to disguise payments from a foreign government and bring the money into the United States. Even after scrutiny by one of the most high-powered teams of prosecutors and investigators ever assembled, it’s still not clear how many millions of dollars passed through these various channels. “Manafort’s financial holdings are substantial, if difficult to quantify precisely because of his varying representations,” Mr. Mueller stated in one legal filing.

With the offshore world so expansive and so in need of transparency, it often falls to journalists and those with access to leaked data to shine light on these secret dealings. Privacy is not an absolute right when the public interest is at stake. And so, journalists must face a difficult question before seeking to publish information that comes from hackers or other unauthorized leaks: Does this information directly affect the well-being of society?

When it comes to the secrecy world, which caters to the moneyed elite and the politically powerful, the answer is often yes. Still, the Mossack Fonseca documents in the Panama Papers were full of confidential information about people who broke no laws. The exposure of this information did not meet a public interest test. Despite complaints by WikiLeaks and other advocacy groups that the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists should have posted all the Panama Papers material online, the organization never seriously contemplated such a move.

What it has done instead is create the world’s most extensive online database of offshore company names, directors and shareholders. This database is about to grow significantly thanks to the Paradise Papers revelations, which include information from 19 corporate registries held by tax havens. The consortium has created a resource that shines a light on shadowy activities that undermine the rule of law and the norms of public responsibility. In this way, a flag has been planted on the boundary between privacy and secrecy.

Op-ed published in the New York Times on Nov. 7, 2017

Jake Bernstein, a senior reporter for the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists in the Panama Papers investigation, is the author of “Secrecy World: Inside the Panama Papers Investigation of Illicit Money Networks and the Global Elite.